E-money safeguarding is essential for several reasons:
- Protects customers' funds: E-money safeguarding ensures that customers' funds are kept separate from the issuer's funds. If the e-money issuer were to become insolvent, customers' funds would not be at risk of being lost or used to pay the issuer's debts.
- Promotes confidence in e-money services: By ensuring that customers' funds are protected, e-money safeguarding helps to build trust in the electronic money industry. This can encourage more people to use e-money services, promoting the growth of digital payments.
- Compliance with regulations: E-money issuers are legally required to safeguard their customers' funds. Failure to do so can result in regulatory sanctions or even the revocation of their operating license.
- Enhances reputation: E-money issuers that comply with e-money safeguarding regulations can strengthen their reputation as trustworthy and responsible businesses. This can help to attract more customers and business partners.
Overall, e-money safeguarding is essential to protecting the interests of customers who use e-money services, promoting confidence in the industry, and ensuring compliance with regulations.
Are EU and UK e-money safeguarding requirements the same?
The e-money safeguarding requirements in the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom (UK) are similar, but there are a few notable differences.
In the EU, the safeguarding e-money requirements are governed by the Electronic Money Directive (EMD) and the revised Payment Services Directive (PSD2). And, EU directives are transposed into national law - so each EU country has implemented regulations that reflect PSD2 / EMD broadly in the same way.
Overall, the e-money safeguarding requirements in the EU and the UK are similar, but there may be some differences due to the implementation of different regulations in the UK.
How is safeguarding different from deposit protection schemes like the FSCS in the UK?
Safeguarding and deposit protection schemes like the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) in the UK are different concepts, although they both relate to protecting customer funds.
Safeguarding is a requirement for e-money issuers to protect their customers' funds by holding them in a separate account or trust arrangement. This ensures that if the e-money issuer were to become insolvent, customers' funds would not be at risk of being lost or used to pay the issuer's debts. Safeguarding is required by law in the UK and the EU.
Deposit protection schemes, on the other hand, are designed to protect customers' funds in case a bank, building society, or credit union becomes insolvent. The FSCS is the deposit protection scheme in the UK, and it protects customers' deposits up to a specific limit (currently £85,000) if the institution they deposited with fails.
The key difference between safeguarding and deposit protection schemes is that safeguarding applies specifically to e-money issuers and their customers. In contrast, deposit protection schemes apply to deposits held with banks, building societies, and credit unions.
In summary, safeguard is required for e-money issuers to protect their customers' funds. At the same time, deposit protection schemes like the FSCS are designed to protect customers' deposits if a bank, building society, or credit union becomes insolvent.
Do you want to learn more about Payhawk, our credit card offering and spend management solution? Check out our corporate cards page or book a demo to find out more.